ARTAS Robot vs Neograft FUE: most important differences

ARTAS ROBOT VS NEOGRAFT FUE; MOST IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES

Currently, there are two technologies that dominate the advancement of hair transplantation and that offer incredible results to patients. Both have been widely compared and that is why in this new entry we will make a comparison between ARTAS robot vs NeoGraft FUE so that you can better understand how it works and the different points between the two.

First we will give you how both tools work and then the main differences that both have. At the end, we will tell you who wins between ARTAS robot vs NeoGraft FUE so that you can define the ideal procedure for you. It is important that you consult with the plastic surgeon who will be in charge of your procedure and that you feel completely safe.

ARTAS Robot vs. NeoGraft FUE procedures

Regarding the ARTAS Robot vs NeoGraft FUE procedures, first we will explain how the surgery is carried out with the robotic arm, since this is the tool in which we specialize in Cancun Hair Restoration. Later we will talk about NeoGraft and its main features.

ARTS Robot

The ARTAS robot is a robotic arm that is one of the most advanced technologies available for hair transplantation. This device is handled by the plastic surgeon and thanks to this, a better job can be done. One of the advantages of this technology is that it speeds up the procedure and unlike how the treatment would be performed manually.

This technology has a unique intelligent system that allows the identification of the best hair follicles to be extracted and can be preserved during the operation. In addition, the ARTAS robot has the ability to make millimeter cuts, both to extract hair follicles and to transplant them.

Thanks to this, you not only speed up the procedure, but also help the healing process to go faster. The cuts, being smaller, can heal better and the patient can return to their daily activities in less time. However, the ARTAS robot cannot function properly without the management of an expert plastic surgeon to operate it.

NeoGraft WAS

This hair transplant system consists of a low-pressure pneumatic rod that allows hair follicles to be extracted more easily. As in the FUE hair transplant, with NeoGraft FUE all the follicles are obtained from the back of the head or from the sides, which is where there is a greater volume of hair.

Once enough hair follicles have been collected to perform the hair transplant, the plastic surgeon begins to use the NeoGraft FUE to place them in the area where there is hair loss. As with the ARTAS robot, the expert hand of a plastic surgeon with extensive experience in hair restoration is required.

In order to determine which are the best hair follicles to perform a hair transplant, the plastic surgeon has to determine which ones are optimal based on his experience. The cuts depend on the expert hand of the medical team, so if you decide to resort to this tool, make sure you go to a high-quality clinic.

ARTAS Robot vs. NeoGraft FUE differences

To define which is better between ARTAS robot vs. NeoGraft FUE, it is important to note that the procedure that is performed is FUE hair transplantation. This consists of the extraction and placement of hair follicles individually to place them in the receiving area where there is greater hair loss.

ARTAS robot vs. NeoGraft FUE are tools that perfect this hair transplant technique and allow the procedure to be accelerated and that it does not last more than 12 hours, as has happened on certain occasions. However, there are contrasting points that we will give you in the following list divided between the selection and extraction of hair follicles:

The selection of the follicular units

  • The ARTAS robotic arm has an operating system that allows the patient’s scalp to be digitally mapped to obtain the best follicles, unlike the NeoGraft FUE.
  • Instead, the NeoGraft FUE is a manual tool to be able to extract the hair follicles and only a plastic surgeon with extensive experience can do it better.

The extraction method

  • Regarding the way of extracting the hair follicles, the ARTAS robot uses a double punch technique , one inside and one outside. First an upper cut is made to open the skin and then a small dissection is made to extract the follicular unit.
  • As for NeoGraft FUE, the extraction is done with a sharp awl which makes a cut in the scalp and, with the help of a suction unit, the hair follicles are extracted; the tool will separate the remaining tissue from the follicle.

The methods of caring for hair follicles is another contrasting point of ARTAS robot vs NeoGraft FUE; while those that are extracted with the first tool have to be kept separately, the second sends them directly to the reserve tank. In addition, with NeoGraft, follicles can be extracted from different parts of the body, not just from the head.

In addition, another point of difference between ARTAS robot and NeoGraft FUE is the cost of the procedure with both tools to improve hair transplantation. Due to the advanced operating system that the ARTAS robot has, which makes its use more expensive than the manual method or with NeoGraft.

As for which of the two is better, this will depend on certain points; while the ARTAS robot technology is more advanced and makes better cuts, the NeoGraft FUE is more economical. Everything will depend on the budget you have to perform the hair transplant, because with both you will have excellent results.

If you need more information regarding the differences between ARTAS robot vs. NeoGraft FUE, we recommend you contact any of the plastic surgeons that collaborate with CHR, as it is important that a doctor determine which is the ideal procedure for you. They are all experts and will provide you with first class care.